State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD)

Site Profiles

To qualify for entry on the website, the site must be an active or former drycleaning facility or wholesale drycleaning supply facility where a remedial system has been installed and operated for a minimum period of one year. In the case of in-situ remediation, at least one injection should have been performed at the site with a minimum of one year of post-injection monitoring conducted.

A guide to submitting profiles is also available for download (PDF) (2pp/38KB) (This link opens a new window).

General Site Information

Site Name:
City:
State/Province: Leave blank for international
Country:
Description: Show/Hide Help	Brief discussion (one or two paragraphs) that answers the following questions or addresses the following areas, as applicable: Historical activity that resulted in contamination. Is this is a commercial or residential property? Is the facility active or abandoned and if abandoned what currently occupies the site? What are the operation dates for the drycleaner? What types of solvent or solvents are/were used? What is the site setting? (E.g. commercial/residential, shopping center/strip mall, etc.) Were there any reported solvent or waste discharges at the facility? What are the identified contaminant source areas? Are there any nearby receptors? Are there any other environmental problems (e.g. USTs, adjacent contaminated properties, etc.)? Did any remediation occur at the site prior to the remedial system discussed in the site profile? If so, provide some brief information on any prior remedial activities. Include any other pertinent information.
Remediation Status:

Site Hydrology

Depth to Groundwater:
Lithology/Subsurface Geology:
Conductivity:
Gradient (ft/ft): (If available)

Pathways

Select media:

Check the boxes for all media sampled.

Groundwater
Sediments
Soil

Please indicate DNAPL presence:

Yes
No
Presumptive Evidence (PCE value of 1.5 mg/L)

Vapor Intrusion Pathway

Has the potential for vapor intrusion (VI) been evaluated?	Yes No Unknown
If the site has been evaluated, how was it evaluated? Check all that apply:	Soil vapor and/or Sub-slab vapor sampling (Sub-slab sampling port, passive and active soil gas, etc.) Indoor air sampling Groundwater sampling Compared sample concentration to screening criteria Used an exposure screening model (e.g., J & E)
If VI has been evaluated check all that apply:	A completed VI pathway has been indentified A potential VI pathway has been identified The VI pathway was ruled out (or does not exist) Undetermined
Has a vapor mitigation system been installed?	Yes No
If yes, what kind of mitigation was used? Check all that apply.	Passive Vapor Barrier Sub-slab Depressurization Sub-slab Pressurization Passive Venting HVAC controls/modifications Crawl space fans Soil Vapor Extraction Other

Additional VI Pathway information:

Contaminants

Contaminants Found:
Select contaminants encountered and supply the amount present in both soil and groundwater.

Contaminant name	Groundwater	Soil

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Benzene
n-butylbenzene
sec-butylbenzene
chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene
ethylbenzene
p-isopropyltoluene
methylene chloride
naphthalene
free-phase Stoddard's Solvent
n-propylbenzene
tert butylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene (TCE)
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene
Vinyl Chloride
p-Xylene
m-Xylene
o-Xylene

Other Contaminants Found:
Please indicate what other contaminants were found.

Depth of groundwater contamination (if available):
Plume Size (if available): Please supply the length, width, and depth

Remediation Scenario

Remediation Action:
Cleanup Goals: Please list cleanup goals for this site

Technologies Used

Technologies		In Situ	Ex Situ

	Air Sparging
	Air Stripping
	Biopile
	Bioremediation
	Biostimulation
	Cap
	Carbon Adsorption
	Chemical Oxidation
	In Situ Flushing
	Incineration
	In-Well Air Stripping
	Monitored Natural Attenuation
	Multi Phase Extraction
	Ozone Air Sparge
	Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRB)
	Pump and Treat
	Recirculating Wells
	Soil Removal
	Soil Vapor Extraction
	Surfactant/Cosolvent Flushing
	Vapor Mitigation
	Zero Valent Iron

Other Technologies: Please list any technologies used that are not listed above.
Why was the technology selected?: Please explain why the technology or technologies were selected for remediating this site.	Briefly describe why this technology was selected.
Date remediation implemented: Enter the date that remediation efforts began.
Final Remediation Design: Show/Hide Help	Final remediation design: Briefly describe the remedial design. A detailed description is not necessary or desirable but the system design must be adequately described. The parameters discussed will be based on the type of remedial system but some pertinent information based on types of systems would be: Excavation – Note how the excavation was performed and the volume or weight of contaminated soil/sediment excavated. SVE – number, & screened interval for SVE and air inlet wells (as applicable), type of wells (horizontal/vertical), blower size & design capacity, vapor treatment system, radius of influence of system Air Sparging/Dual Phase Extraction – type and number of wells & screened intervals, depths, designed flow/recovery rate, water/vapor treatment methods and water disposal method. In-situ Remedial Technologies: type & quantity of injectant, method of injection (wells, direct push, etc.), number of injection points, spacing for injection points, injection interval, injection pressure

Results and Next Steps

Date the system was shut down. Estimate the mass recovered. How did the system operate relative to design projections (e.g. operational flow rates vs. design flow rates, radius of influence, etc.)? What problems were encountered during system operation and how were they overcome? What modifications were made to the system? For in-situ remedial systems compare pre-injection and post-injection contaminant concentrations Discuss likely causes of rebound/failed remedial actions.
Results achieved to date: Please describe the results that have been achieved to date.
Next steps: Please list the next steps anticipated at this site.

Costs

Submit costs if available according to the categories below.

Cost for site assessment: Please indicate the co st to assess the site.
Cost for design and implementation: Please indicate the cost to design and implement the remediation method selected.
Please indicate annual O&M expense: Please indicate the cost for operation and maintence of the remediation system.
Total costs: Please indicate the total cost of the remediation effort (for completed projects only)

Lessons Learned

The best way to improve our remedial systems is to study failures. Address the following questions, as applicable in this section.

What did you learn from this site?
If you had a similar site would you use the same technology and approach? If not, what would you do differently?
How could the remedial system be improved?

Lessons learned:
Please share any experiences learned from the remediation project

Contacts

Principal Point of Contact:
Please supply the name, address, phone number and e-mail address of the principal contact for this site profile. Please include applicable contractors.

Site Specific References

References:
Please supply the title and publication date of documents or articles that specifically address cleanup at this site.

Upload Images

Upload images (optional):
You may upload up to three .GIF, .JPG, or .PNG

1.
caption:
2.
caption:
3.
caption:

Note: Please be sure to use the "Submit Profile" button to submit your profile for review. Profiles that are left in draft status will not be reviewed or posted until they are submitted as final.
If only a portion of the data has been entered and you want to come back and complete your profile later, click here:
If all data has been entered and your profile is ready to be posted, click here:
If you want to erase the contents of this form, click here: